| Pages: 1 [2] 3 |
21. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: Who cares if there were more than 2 traders just follow the transaction trail applying negative balances if needs be. true, but on the other hand who honestly cares about your baby-like moaning?
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.07.24 11:52:00
|
22. Supercapital Advice - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
RavenPaine wrote: 3rd party: Wirox, Chribba, Darknesss, Grendell, Sohmer, Iceman62 . (Spelling) The point is, use a proven 3rd. . I see what you did there... Nice try
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.07.24 07:49:00
|
23. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Jorma Morkkis wrote: Ok... - I buy a corp with 5.0 faction standing - I get my research alt in (let's say this character has 2.0 standing with said faction) - Corp's standing with that faction will drop. maaate, I think your pedals are go...
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.07.19 01:14:00
|
24. Free isk give away. The only truly free lottery in eve. - in Sell Orders [original thread]
1 more
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.07.12 12:15:00
|
25. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Kara Books wrote: shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: Krawdad wrote: For now, disregarding the specifics I mentioned, do you think the idea could ever be used to achieve a compromise? Do you think limiting the production capabilities of the t2 ...
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.06.23 21:05:00
|
26. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: Yeah Joy, T2BPO undercutting my manufcature and invention cost lucky for me I have the potential to blow billions of ISK away with multiple BPC's in mutliple slots while the T2BPO is stuck making zero effort profit in one...
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.06.22 17:42:00
|
27. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: the fact that invention has lower ME than a T2BPO is moronic ..no its not. T2 BPOs give you a quite low hard limit on how much you can build with them, so they have to have a better ME to be of any use. Invention d...
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.06.22 16:35:00
|
28. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: WTF are you on? You link two different ships. Remove T2BPO make EVE real. no ****, I linked two ships! 2 examples to prove that your theory about interceptors was just wrong. first example that showed you, that eve...
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.06.15 23:27:00
|
29. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: ''Interceptors'' A commonly used and commonly destroyed ship which is dominated by a handful of t2BPO owners. Sweet. Remove T2BPO let non pet players manufacture interceptors for profit instead of CCP's chosen friends. ...
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.06.15 22:48:00
|
30. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: By significant he means absolutely game breaking for those that do no own said T2BPO. To say the amount of Hulks produced from BPO is ********. It's billions of isk worth each month. http://eveeye.com/profit.asp?blue...
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.06.15 20:50:00
|
31. [WTA] ONEIROS BPO - in Sell Orders [original thread]
97 bn
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.06.15 10:17:00
|
32. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
poor Brewlar ...seriously sad to read
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.06.14 15:21:00
|
33. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Tadeo Musashy wrote: it remembers me of king's vanities in Paris's 17th century, or Tzar's attitude in old Rusia's early 1900... or 80-90 years latter Easter Europe - other times, other "Tzars", same attitude, same outcome, ... Are you se...
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.05.31 09:25:00
|
34. the importance of T2 BPOs - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Morgan Dinn wrote: I would be fine with either having more T2 originals or removing T2 BPOs. suuuuure... makes a lot of sense... mind linking us the sell-thread of these said prints?
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.05.08 17:49:00
|
35. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
yea ok, Inties probably compete with faction hulls a lot, but why are you so selective with your examples and ignore that Hulk, Cap.Recharger II or cov ops cloak. so... 92% of Covert Ops cloaking Device II produced using BPC`S WTF OMG, Boost BPO...
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.05.05 00:20:00
|
36. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: T2BPO's in some lines is not irrelevant. Invention should be more efficient than T2BPO . And why? because T2 BPOs cost 100 times more than an Invention with similar effort?... I dont get it Also, could you please li...
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.05.04 23:18:00
|
37. WTB: T2 Ship BPO`s - in Want Ads & Trades [original thread]
mail me what you got. (if anyone else is looking for items of this kind, make your own thread, tia)
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.04.24 02:03:00
|
38. GëíGëêGëíGëêGëíGëêGëíGëêGëíGëêGëí OCCATOR BPO GëíGëêGëíGëêGëíGëêGëíGëêGëíGëêGëí - in Sell Orders [original thread]
mute wrote: Someone posts BPO for sale* Some guy with WTB Occator BPO in forum sig shows up* Seems legit. 20b Bid to be fair I-¦ve seen that Sig way before this Thread got put up.
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.04.18 15:51:00
|
39. [Lottery] 10 bil prices inside - in Sell Orders [original thread]
agree this isnt a scam, but not because you or the one of your 2 corp mates/alts havent tried to :p
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.04.16 16:26:00
|
40. [Lottery] 10 bil prices inside - in Sell Orders [original thread]
Mumuit II wrote: I'm make a grand lottery I`m stopped reading after this already...
- by Ore Bunny - at 2012.04.15 23:27:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |